A London high court has revealed significant misconduct involving a claimant who was found to have received answers through smart glasses during his testimony. Laimonas Jakštys was determined to be “untruthful in denying his use of the smart glasses,” according to insolvency judge Raquel Agnello KC. This decision emerged during a case where Jakštys, alongside the Lithuanian company UAB Business Enterprise, contested a ruling by the Insolvency and Companies List. The judge’s findings highlighted that Jakštys's witness statements were likely prepared by others, undermining the integrity of the legal process involved. Observations made during his testimony indicated irregularities; specifically, the... [Continue Reading]