Trump bans CNN, MSNOW, and Politico from White House over alleged fake news
President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social at 18 September 2026 at 20:04 BST: "I am proud to announce that, effective immediately, I am banning Fake News CNN, MSNOW (who recently changed their name from MSNBC due to lack of viewership and credibility!), and Politico (The recipients of an illegal and ridiculous $8 Million Dollar subscription, an All Time Record, directly from the United States Government, under Crooked Joe Biden, in order to keep them "alive." Seems like corruption to me!), from the White House as a result of their constant "reporting" FAKE NEWS! Media Outlets shouldn't be able to constantly write or report FICTION and LIES when they're covering the President of the United States, the Trump Administration, or the United States of America." "Other Fake News Media Outlets to follow.
Sponsored
Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
Explanation:
President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social at 18 September 2026 at 20:04 BST: he said he is banning CNN, MSNOW, and Politico from the White House, and said more outlets could follow. The post signals a direct escalation in the White House's confrontation with major media organizations, with immediate implications for press access, pool coverage, and the administration's broader posture toward independent reporting.
Because the message is framed as an immediate access restriction, it is a concrete policy and communications signal, not just rhetorical hostility. The move fits a longer pattern of Trump attacking legacy media and challenging journalistic access, and it recalls earlier disputes over press credentials and White House briefing access during his prior public fights with news outlets.
The Politico reference also adds a corruption allegation tied to government subscriptions under the Biden administration, which could sharpen congressional and legal scrutiny even if the post itself does not announce a formal legal action. Markets are unlikely to react directly, but the announcement increases reputational and institutional risk, and it raises the chance of retaliatory media coverage, litigation, and broader tensions over transparency and first-amendment concerns.
Sponsored


