UK Court of Appeal due to rule on Palestine Action terror designation

The UK Court of Appeal is expected to rule on Monday on whether the government acted lawfully when it proscribed Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. The case centres on a ban imposed last July and later challenged by the group in the High Court. The appeal is being closely watched because it could determine whether the designation remains in force.

Sponsored

The government appealed after the High Court ruled in February that the ban was unlawful and disproportionate. Earlier this month, a court in London also ruled that four activists convicted of criminal damage at a British facility owned by an Israeli weapons group should be sentenced on the basis that their actions had a terrorist connection. That ruling has added to the legal and political attention around the wider case.

Palestine Action is a British protest group founded six years ago. It says it uses disruptive tactics against companies it describes as corporate enablers of Israel's military campaign, including Elbit Systems, Leonardo, Thales and Teledyne. British police have said the group's actions have caused millions of pounds in criminal damage, while critics argue its members have damaged property but not carried out violent acts that meet the threshold for terrorism.

The proscription placed Palestine Action in the same legal category as armed groups such as al-Qaeda and ISIL. Days after the Brize Norton attack, members of parliament voted in favour of the ban, and the move has since drawn criticism from more than 130 high-profile public figures. At least 1,600 arrests linked to support for Palestine Action were made in the three months after the ban, underlining the scale of the public and policing response.

Sponsored

The case matters because it tests how far the UK government can go in using terrorism powers against a protest movement that says it targets property rather than people. It also raises questions about the boundary between criminal damage, protest activity and terrorism law. The outcome may affect how similar direct-action campaigns are treated in future.

Palestine Action's co-founder, Huda Ammori, launched the legal challenge last August, and the High Court heard a three-day judicial review in November before issuing its February ruling. The government then appealed, setting up the Court of Appeal decision now due. What remains unclear is whether the court will uphold the earlier finding that the ban was unlawful, and what immediate effect that would have on the proscription and related arrests.

#PalestineAction #CourtofAppeal #proscription #terrorismlaw #HighCourt