Zambia election shaped by economy and critical minerals wealth
Zambia's election is being framed by voters' concerns over the economy, poverty and the country's mineral wealth. President Hakainde Hichilema is presenting the vote as a test of the economic recovery he says has taken place under his leadership. The contest is also drawing international attention because Zambia is rich in critical minerals, even as many citizens say they have yet to see the benefits.
Sponsored
The report says the World Bank estimates that 70 percent of the population lives on less than three dollars a day. That figure underlines the scale of the economic challenge facing the country and helps explain why livelihoods are central to the campaign. The election is therefore being watched not only as a domestic political event, but also as a signal of how Zambia may manage its resource wealth.
Zambia's mineral endowment has made it strategically important at a time when critical minerals are increasingly sought after for global industry and energy transition supply chains. The report does not specify which minerals are most in focus, but it makes clear that the country's resource base is part of the wider political debate. That creates pressure on whoever wins to show that mineral wealth can translate into broader public benefit.
The discussion around the vote also reflects a longer-running question in Zambia about how economic growth is shared. The report contrasts official claims of recovery with the reality described by the World Bank poverty estimate. It suggests that the election outcome may shape not only policy direction, but also public expectations about whether the benefits of growth can reach ordinary households.
Sponsored
The report includes commentary from Oliver Saasa of Mulungushi University, Sishuwa Sishuwa of Stellenbosch University and Christopher Vandome of Chatham House's Africa Programme, indicating that the election is being assessed through both domestic and international lenses. Their involvement points to the broader significance of the vote for governance, economic policy and the management of strategic resources. Zambia's role as a mineral-rich country means the result may be followed closely beyond its borders.
What remains unclear from the report is how voters will weigh the government's recovery claims against persistent poverty, and whether mineral wealth will become a decisive campaign issue. The article does not provide polling data or election results. The main question now is whether the outcome will strengthen confidence in the current economic direction or deepen pressure for a different approach to growth and resource management.

