Australia drops plan to make ASIO questioning powers permanent
The Australian government has backed away from a plan to make ASIO's compulsory questioning powers permanent, while still moving to broaden the offences covered by the law. The change means the powers will continue to have sunset provisions, with a review now required every three years. The legislation is part of a wider update to Australia's national security framework and is expected to proceed with support from the Coalition.
Sponsored
The powers were introduced in the wake of the 11 September 2001 attacks in the United States and allow intelligence officers to issue a questioning warrant requiring a person as young as 14 to provide information or produce items that may assist a serious investigation. The government had previously said it wanted to remove the so-called sunset provisions from the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act. It later dropped that plan as the Senate moved closer to voting on the bill.
Under the revised approach, the government will expand the offences covered by the rules to include promotion of communal violence and attacks on Australia's defence system. It had also wanted sabotage, promotion of communal violence and serious threats to Australia's territorial and border integrity to be covered. Labor has said the changes are justified by what it describes as a "dynamic, diverse and degraded" security environment.
The shift is significant because it preserves a parliamentary check on powers that have existed for more than two decades. Sunset clauses require lawmakers to revisit the legislation at regular intervals, and the government's decision to keep them suggests it was unwilling to risk the bill failing in the Senate. The move also reflects the political sensitivity around expanding intelligence powers, particularly where they can apply to young people and to conduct that critics say may be too broad.
Sponsored
The debate has also highlighted the role of ASIO, Australia's domestic intelligence agency, in responding to threats that the government says are changing in character. The proposed amendments would widen the scope of the questioning regime at the same time as they preserve the basic structure of the post-2001 laws. Greens justice spokesperson David Shoebridge has said the government was forced to reverse course and restore the sunset clause, and he raised concerns about the breadth of the expanded criteria.
What remains unclear is how far the final bill will go in defining the new offences and how the review process will operate in practice. It is also not yet clear whether further amendments will be made before parliament completes its consideration. The key issue to watch is whether the government can secure passage of the legislation while maintaining support for the expanded powers and the three-year review cycle.
Sponsored
