Trump says Gaza talks reached breakthrough on Hamas disarmament and Israeli withdrawal
US President Donald Trump said talks in Cairo had produced a breakthrough on Gaza that could lead to Hamas disarming and Israeli forces withdrawing in phases. He described the development as a "historic agreement" for the complete disarmament of Hamas and said it would be tied to a new Palestinian governing arrangement. The announcement was made on his social media account and referred to a role for the Board of Peace.
Sponsored
The latest reporting says mediators were discussing a US-brokered Gaza peace plan with Hamas leaders in Cairo, and that progress had been made. But the same material says an Israeli official found the proposed terms unsatisfactory, and sources close to the talks told Reuters that it was still uncertain whether any agreement would hold. The Israeli embassy in Washington and Hamas did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The development matters because disarmament remains one of the central unresolved issues in efforts to stabilise Gaza after the war. Linking Israeli withdrawal to a phased disarmament process, and to a new Palestinian government working with the Board of Peace, suggests the talks are aimed at both security and post-war governance. The reporting also indicates that the second phase of the ceasefire plan is being treated as part of a broader framework rather than a standalone military arrangement.
The supplied material places the talks within a wider diplomatic effort involving Egypt, Qatar and Turkey, which have all been named as mediators. It also says the plan would eventually allow Israeli forces to withdraw, while Gaza would no longer be used as a base for attacks. That makes the current discussions significant not only for the ceasefire itself, but also for the question of who would control security and administration in Gaza after the fighting.
Sponsored
There are still important gaps in the public record. The material does not confirm whether the terms have been formally accepted by all sides, how disarmament would be verified, or what timetable would apply to any Israeli withdrawal. It also does not explain how the new Palestinian governing arrangement would be formed or what powers the Board of Peace would have in practice.
For now, the announcement is a notable diplomatic claim, but the practical implementation remains unclear. The next developments to watch are formal responses from Hamas and Israel, further detail from the mediators in Cairo, and any clarification on sequencing and enforcement. The outcome will be important for the future of the ceasefire and for the wider question of governance in Gaza.
US President Donald Trump said the agreement reached by his so-called Board of Peace covers the complete disarmament of Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza. He said the plan would be carried out in phases, with Israeli forces withdrawing as disarmament progresses and an International Stabilisation Force working alongside a new Palestinian police force. The announcement was made in a post on Truth Social and was presented by Trump as a major milestone in the implementation of his 20-point plan.
The latest reporting says mediators from Egypt, Qatar and Turkey are involved in the talks, and that a meeting in Cairo is expected to focus on the second phase of the Gaza ceasefire plan. The supplied rows say Hamas leaders have been in Cairo discussing the deal, while one unnamed Hamas official described the talks as positive and making progress. At the same time, the material also says neither Hamas nor Israel had publicly confirmed the agreement at the time of publication.
Sponsored
The development matters because disarmament has been one of the central unresolved issues in efforts to stabilise Gaza after the war. Linking Israeli withdrawal to disarmament, and tying both to an international force and a new Palestinian police structure, suggests the plan is aimed not only at ending active fighting but also at shaping post-war security and governance. The reporting also indicates that the proposal is being treated as part of a broader ceasefire framework rather than a standalone security measure.
The supplied material adds that Hamas announced on 6 July the dissolution of the body it had led in Gaza for nearly two decades. It also says the second phase of the ceasefire plan includes the reconstruction of Gaza, alongside the disarmament process. That places the current talks within a wider effort to move from battlefield arrangements to a longer-term political and administrative settlement.
There are still important gaps in the public record. The supplied rows do not confirm whether the agreement has been formally signed by all sides, how the disarmament would be verified, or what timetable would apply to Israeli withdrawal. They also do not say how the new Palestinian police force would be formed, who would command the International Stabilisation Force, or what role the Board of Peace would have in practice.
For now, the announcement marks a significant diplomatic claim, but the practical implementation remains unclear. The next developments to watch are formal responses from Hamas and Israel, further detail from the mediators in Egypt, Qatar and Turkey, and any clarification on sequencing and enforcement. The outcome will be important for the future of the ceasefire and for the question of who governs Gaza after the war.
US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that an agreement had been reached for the complete disarmament of Hamas and all armed factions in the Gaza Strip. He described the deal as a historic step toward peace and said Gaza would be administered by a new Palestinian government after the weapons are handed over. The announcement was made in a social media post and comes amid the ceasefire framework that Trump said was signed in October 2025.
According to the reporting supplied, the agreement was mediated with the help of Egypt, Qatar and Turkey. Trump said it forms part of the wider peace plan that ended the war in Gaza after two years. Earlier reporting cited by the same material said Hamas was moving toward an arrangement that included full dismantlement, although a source from the group said it was still negotiating changes to the proposal.
The development matters because disarmament has been one of the central unresolved issues in efforts to stabilise Gaza after the war. Israel has repeatedly said that any process must include the complete disarmament of Hamas, the removal of weapons from Gaza and the full demilitarisation of the territory before further political steps can proceed. A political source in Israel told AFP that the proposal still did not fully meet Israel's demands, suggesting that key details remain contested.
The announcement also points to the role of regional mediators in trying to turn the ceasefire into a longer-term political arrangement. Egypt, Qatar and Turkey have all been named as involved in the talks, underlining the extent to which outside actors remain central to any settlement in Gaza. The reference to a new Palestinian government suggests that the disarmament issue is being linked directly to questions of post-war administration and authority.
The supplied material does not confirm whether the agreement has been formally signed by all sides or whether Hamas has accepted the terms without reservation. It also does not set out a timetable for disarmament, the transfer of weapons, or the formation of the new government. What remains unclear is how far the proposal has advanced beyond the negotiating stage and whether Israel, Hamas and the mediators will now present a unified position.
For now, the announcement marks a significant diplomatic claim, but the practical implementation appears unresolved. The next developments to watch are any formal response from Hamas, further clarification from Israel, and whether the mediators provide details on sequencing and verification. The outcome will be important for the future of the ceasefire and for the wider question of who governs Gaza after the war.
Sponsored
