Balkan politics shape ties with Israel as domestic divisions drive divergent positions
Balkan countries are taking markedly different positions on Israel, with domestic politics, defence deals and strategic interests shaping their responses rather than any shared regional line. The divergence has become more visible during Israel's war on Gaza, as concern over Israeli conduct has grown across much of Europe. In the Balkans, however, experts say the region's fragmented politics make a common stance unlikely.
Sponsored
Marko Prelec, an analyst at the International Crisis Group, said the region has "almost no common positions at all", adding that it is therefore not surprising that views on Israel and Gaza are "all over the map". Florian Bieber, professor of Southeast European history and politics at the University of Graz, said positions on Israel are strongly influenced by domestic politics and national narratives. He said this makes a regional or even country-specific consensus unlikely.
The clearest example is Bosnia and Herzegovina, where the war in Gaza has deepened existing ethno-national divisions. Bosniak political representatives and much of the public in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina have expressed strong solidarity with Palestinians. In Republika Srpska, leaders have been openly pro-Israel, while some Croat political figures have also taken a more sympathetic tone towards Israel.
Bieber said Bosniak solidarity with Palestinians is often linked not only to ideology but also to memories of war and victimhood, with some comparing the Palestinian experience to the Bosniak experience during the 1990s. That comparison gives the issue a particular emotional and political weight in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It also shows how the Gaza war is being interpreted through local histories rather than only through foreign policy calculations.
Sponsored
The broader European context also matters. Across much of the continent, the position has shifted from unconditional solidarity with Israel towards greater concern about its conduct in Gaza. Spain and the Republic of Ireland have been among the more vocal critics of Israel, but the overall trend has been a more cautious and critical European debate.
Balkan governments are operating within that wider shift, even if their own responses remain highly uneven. The article points to a region where foreign policy is often transactional and shaped by unrelated interests. In that setting, ties with Israel can reflect defence cooperation, diplomatic positioning or internal identity politics rather than a coherent regional approach.
That makes the Balkans a useful example of how the Gaza war is being filtered through local political realities far beyond the Middle East. What remains unclear is whether any Balkan government will move towards a more consistent position as the war continues. The available material does not indicate a unified regional response, and experts quoted in the report suggest that is unlikely.
The key issue to watch is whether domestic political divisions, especially in Bosnia and Herzegovina, deepen further as the conflict continues to shape public debate.
Sponsored
Sponsored
