Netanyahu denies report of rift with army chief over possible Iran action on election eve
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has denied reports of a confrontation with the head of the country's army over possible military action against Iran, as campaigning entered its final day before a general election. The allegations emerged amid growing speculation in Israel that the government could consider a strike before polls open on Tuesday morning. Final opinion polls suggest the vote could end in deadlock, adding to the political sensitivity of the claims.
More from 360LiveNews Opinion
According to reports cited in the Israeli press, army chief Eyal Zamir was said to have resisted carrying out unspecified military action linked to Iran and had asked for signed legal authorisation from the political leadership. One report said senior military officials did not believe any such attack was urgently needed. Netanyahu rejected the account, saying there had been no confrontation, while Defence Minister Israel Katz described the reports as false and said there was complete coordination between the political leadership and the military.
Katz also said there was no intention to launch an attack on Iran before the election. The reports suggested that Zamir had sought a detailed discussion and legal guarantees before acting on any directive, although the outlet behind the claim did not specify the order in question. The same report said there were concerns inside the army that the war could be used for political gain, a claim that has sharpened the dispute around the timing of the story.
The episode matters because it touches both national security and the conduct of an election that could reshape Israel's political balance. Netanyahu has campaigned heavily on his security record and has argued that only he can complete the task in the US-Israeli war against Iran. Any suggestion of military action on the eve of a vote is likely to intensify scrutiny of whether security decisions are being weighed alongside domestic political considerations.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
The reports also drew in opposition figures. Yair Lapid accused Netanyahu of wanting to trigger an escalation with Iran in order to delay the election, while former army chief Gadi Eisenkot issued a warning directed at the prime minister. Their comments underline how closely the Iran issue has become tied to the campaign, with security policy now part of the broader contest over who should lead the country.
What remains unclear is whether any military plan was ever under active consideration, and whether the reported disagreement reflected a real operational dispute or a political row amplified during the campaign. It is also not clear what, if anything, the army chief was asked to authorise. The immediate focus now is on the election itself, the final polling outcome, and whether the controversy continues to shape debate after voting begins.
