Trump calls for expanding Abraham Accords in proposed deal to end war with Iran
The president has called for more countries to recognise Israel as part of any deal to end the war with Iran. The proposal would expand the Abraham Accords framework, which was originally designed to normalise relations between Israel and several Arab states. Analysts quoted in reporting on the statement said the chances of such an outcome are close to zero.
Sponsored
The remarks were made on 28 May 2026, according to the supplied report. They link two separate diplomatic tracks: efforts to end the war with Iran and the wider question of Arab-Israeli recognition. The statement did not include details on which countries might be asked to join or what concessions would be part of the arrangement.
The immediate significance lies in the fact that the proposal would tie regional recognition of Israel to a settlement involving Iran, a connection that is not presented as part of any confirmed negotiation. The Abraham Accords are a known diplomatic framework, but the supplied material does not indicate that any government has accepted the idea or that talks are under way. The reporting instead suggests the idea has been met with scepticism.
The issue matters because it touches on one of the central diplomatic fault lines in the Middle East. Recognition of Israel has long been a sensitive political question for many governments in the region, and any attempt to make it a condition of a broader war settlement would add another layer to already complex negotiations. The proposal also places the Abraham Accords back into the centre of debate over how regional normalisation might be linked to security arrangements.
Sponsored
The supplied material does not identify any responding governments, nor does it say whether the proposal was raised in formal talks or in a public statement. It also does not set out how the war with Iran would be ended, what role the United States would play, or whether Israel has been consulted. What is clear is that the idea has been described by analysts as highly unlikely to succeed.
For now, the main question is whether the statement leads to any diplomatic follow-up or remains a political signal. It is also unclear whether any countries would be willing to consider recognition of Israel in the context described. Further reporting would be needed to establish whether the proposal has any practical traction or is likely to remain rhetorical.
Sponsored
